The Competitiveness of Nations in a Global Knowledge-Based Economy
April 2002
BIOTECHNOLOGY
Literature Search
1. Abelson, P. H., The Changing Frontiers of Science and
Technology, Science, 273 5274, 1996/07/26, 445-447.
2. Adler, R. G., Biotechnology as an Intellectual
Property, Science, 224 4647, 1984/04/27, 357-363.
3. Akin, D., For science or money?, Globe &
Mail,
4. Akin, D., Genetics on the run, Globe &
Mail,
5. Allansdottir, A. et al, Innovation and
competitiveness in European biotechnology, European Commission Enterprise
Directorate-General, July 2002, http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/library/enterprise-papers/pdf/enterprise_paper_07_2002.pdf,
2002.
6. Allen, A., Bioethics come of age, Salon.com,
http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/09/28/caplan/index.html,
2000/09/28.
7. Amos, J., The dangers of bio-prospecting, The
Economist, 2002/02/16.
8. Argote, L., Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for
Competitive Advantage in Firms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 82 1, 2000/05, 150-169.
9. Argote, L. et al, Introduction: - Knowledge Transfer
in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others, Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 1, 2000/05,
1-8.
10. Arora, A. and Gambardella A., Complementarity and
External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechonology,
Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 4, 1990/06,
361-379.
11. Audretsch, D. B. and Stehpan P. E.,
Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology, American
Economic Review, 86 3, 1996/06, 641-652.
12. Audretsch, D. B and Stephan P. E., Knowledge
spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives, Journal of Evolutionary
Economics, 9 1999, 97-107.
13.
14. Baylis, F., Our ethics are embryonic, Globe &
Mail,
15. BBC News, Embryo research licences granted, BBC
News, 2002/03/01.
16. Benford, G., Saving the "Library of Life",
Proceedings of the
17. Berg, P. and Singer M. F., The Recombinant DNA
Controversy: Twenty Years Later, Proceedings of the
18. Black, H., Diagnosing Bioterrorism: Applying New
Technologies, The Scientist, 15 8, 2001/07/23.
19. Blume, H., Open Science Online, American
Prospect, 11 10, http://www.prospect.org/print/V11/10/blume-h.html,
2000/03/27.
20. Borrus, M., Investing on the Frontier, American
Prospect, 3 11, http://www.prospect.org/print/V3/11/borrus-m.html,
1992/09/01.
21. Bowen, J., Brave new world or future shock?,
Salon. com, http://www.salon.com/health/feature/1999/11/17/medical_future/index.html,
1999/11/17.
22. Bredahl, L., Consumer's Cognitions With Regards to
Genetically Modified Foods. Results of a Qualitative Study in Four Countries,
Appetite, 33 1999, 343-360.
23. Briggs, S. P., Plant Genomics: More than Food for
Thought, Proceedings of the
24. Bueckert, D., Patenting of genes done 'for years',
Globe & Mail,
25. Cahill, L. S., Genetics, Commodification, and Social
Justice in the Globalization Era, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 11
3, 2001, 221-238.
26. Canadian Biotechnology Strategy Secretariat, The
1998 Canadian Biotechnology Strategy: An Ongoing Renewal Process, Industry
27. Coale, K., Mutant Food, Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/01/12/food/index.html,
2000/01/12 .
28. COBFAA, Opportunities in Biotechnology for Future
Army Applications, National Academy Press, http://books.nap.edu/books/0309075556/html/index.html,
2001/06/20.
29. Cole-Turner, R., Religion and Gene Patenting,
Science, 270 5233, 1995/10, 52.
30. Coleman, R. F., Biotechnology Policy and Achievement
1980-88, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 324
1224, 1989/08/31, 439-445.
31. Commonwealth of Australia, Developing Australia's
Biotechnology Future, InfoAus, http://www.biotechnology.gov.au/industry_research/reports/pdiscussion_paper_pdf.PDF,
1999/09.
32. Compton, M., Lean, green gene-counting machine,
Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/tech/view/2000/04/24/incyte/index.html,
2000/04/24.
33. Culotta, E., New Startups Move in As Gene Therapy
Goes Commercial, Science, 260 5110, 1993, 914-915.
34. Dart, E. C., Exploitation of Biotechnology in a
Large Company, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,
324 1224, 1989, 599-611.
35. DeBord, M., Biotech at the Barricades, Atlantic
Unbound, http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/citation/wc981111.htm,
1998/11/11.
36. Deftos, L. J., Patenting Life: The Harvard Mouse
that Has Nor Roared, The Scientists, 23 6,
2000/11/27.
37. Drexler, M., The Germ Front: The best defense
against biterrorism is a good offense, American Prospects, 12 19, http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/19/drexler-m.html,
2001/11/05.
38. Dreyfuss, R., Popping Contributions, American
Prospect, Vol. 8 33, http://www.prospect.org/print/V8/33/dreyfuss-r.html,
1997/08/01.
39. Drucker, P., Beyond the Information Revolution,
Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99oct/9910drucker.htm,
1999/10,
47-57.
40. Dunwell, J. M., Transgenic Crops: The Next
Generation, or an Example of 2020 Vision, Annals of Biology, 84 1999,
269-277.
41. Dworkin, G., Should There Be Property Rights in
Genes?, Philosophical Transactions, 352 1357, 1997/08/29,
1077-1086.
42. Easterbrook, G., Will Homo Sapiens become Obsolete?
Medical Evolution, The New
Republic, http://www.tnr.com/022800/easterbrook030199.html,
1999/03/01.
43. Eisenberg, R. S., Genes, Patents, and Product
Development, Science, 257 5072, 903-908.
44. Elliott, C., Pharma Buys a Conscience, American
Prospect, 12 17, http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/17/elliott-c.html,
2001/09/24.
45. Escobar, A., After Nature: Steps to an
Antiessentialist Political Ecology, Current Anthropology, 40 1, 1999/02,
1-20.
46. Eswaran, M. and Gallini N., Patent Policy and the
Direction of Technological Change, RAND
Journal of Economics, 27 4, 1996/Winter, 722-746.
47. Ezzell, C., Cloning and the Law, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2001/112401ezzell/index.html,
2001/11/24.
48. Federoff, N. V. and Cohen J. E., Plants and
Population: Is There Time?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States, 96 11, 1999/05/25, 5903-5907.
49. Feisee, L., Anything Under the Sun Made by
Man, 2001/04/11, http://www.bio.org/news/041101.html.
50. Feldman, C. B., Economic Fundamentals Sound:
Deal-Making within the Biotechnology Industry, 2001/10/29, http://www.bio.org/news/speeches/20011029.asp.
51. Foss, K., Genetic research worries biologists,
Globe & Mail, Toronto, 2001/10/05, A11.
52. Fulton, M. & Giannakas K., Agricultural
biotechnology and industry structure, AgBioForum , 4 2, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
2001,
137-151.
53. Gilbert, S. C., Diachronic Biology Meets Evo-Devo:
C.H. Waddington's Approach to Evolutionary Developmental Biology, American
Zoologist, 40 5, 2000, 729-737.
54. Goozner, M., Patenting Life, American
Prospect, 11 26, http://www.prospect.org/print/V11/26/goozner-m.html,
2000/12/18.
55. Halal, W. E., The Top 10 Emerging Technologies,
The Futurist, 34 4, 2000/07, 1.
56. Haseltine, W. A., Beyond Chicken Soup, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/2001/1101issue/1101haseltine.html#bar,
2001/11.
57. Hopkin, K., The Post-Genome Project, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/2001/0801issue/0801scicit7.html,
2001/08.
58. Hopkin, K., The Risks on the Table, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/2001/0401issue/0401hopkin.html,
2001/04.
59. Horsch, R. B., Commercialization of Genetically
Engineered Crops, Philosophical Transactions, 342 1301, 1993/11/29,
287-291.
60. Howard, K., The Bioinformatics Gold Rush,
Scientific American, http://www.sciam.com/2000/0700issue/0700howard.html#link1,
2000/07.
61. Industry Canada, The 1998 Canadian Biotechnology
Strategy: An Ongoing Renewal Process, Industry Canada, Ottawa,
1998.
62. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, Safety aspects
of genetically modified foods of plant origin, World Health Organization,
Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.who.int/fsf/GMfood/FAO-WHO_Consultation_report_2000.pdf,
2000/05-2000/06/30.
63. Kaiser, J., New Biotech Law Shores Up U.S. Firms, Science, 270 5237, 1995/11/03,
728.
64. Kalaitzandonakes, N., Why does biotech regulation
differ so much between the US and EU?, AgBioForum, 3 2&3, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
2000, 75-76.
65. Karow, J., Publish Free or Perish, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2001/042301publish/index.html,
2001/04/23.
66. Kass, L. R., Preventing a Brave New World, The
New Republic, http://www.tnr.com/052101/kass052101.html,
2001/05/21.
67. Katz, S. B., Language and persuasion in
biotechnology communication with the public: How not to say what you're not
going not to say and not say it, AgBioForum, 4 2, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
2001, 93-97.
68. Kerr, W. A. et al, Intellectual property protection,
biotechnology and developing countries: Will the trips be effective?, AgBioForum, 2 3&4, 1999, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
203-211.
69. Kiley, T. D., Patents on Random Complementary DNA
Fragments?, Science, 257 5072, 1992/08/14.
70. Kirschenmann, F., Biotechnology on the Ground:
What Kind of Future Can Farmers Expect and What Kind Should They Create?,
National Agricultural Biotechnology Meeting, Lincoln, Nebraska,
1999/06/07.
71. Kishore, G. M. and Shewmaker C., Biotechnology:
Enhancing Human Nutrition in Developing and Developed Worlds, Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96 11,
1999/05/25, 5968-5972.
72. Knoppers, B. M. and Chadwick R., The Human Genome
Project: Under an International Ethical Microscope, Science, 265 5181,
1994/09/30, 2035-2036.
73. Leisinger, K. M., The "Political Economy" of
Agricultural Biotechnology for the Developing World, 2002, http://www.syngentafoundation.com/political_economy_agricultural_biotechnology.htm#achievements.
74. Lerner, J., The Importance of Patent Scope: An
Empirical Analysis, Rand Journal of Economics, 25 2, 1994/Summer,
319-333.
75. Lesser, W. , Intellectual property rights and
concentration in agricultural biotechnology, AgBioForum, 1 2, 1998, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
56-61.
76. Long, C., The Future of Biotechnology: Promises and
Problems, American Enterprise Magazine, http://www.theamericanenterprise.org/taeso98p.htm,
1998/09-1998/10/31.
77. Maddox, J., The Unexpected Science to Come...,
Scientific American, http://www.sciam.com/1999/1299issue/1299maddox.html,
1999/12.
78. Mahoney, R. J. and Littlejohn S. E., Innovation on
Trial: Punative Damages Versus New Products, Science, 246 4936, 1989/12/15,
1395-1399.
79. Marocco, D. A., Biology for the 21st Century: The
Search for a Core, American Biology Teacher, 62 8, 2000,
565-569.
80. Martin, C. J., Biotech Trends, Btech Investors, http://www.btechnews.com/sample_reports/BiotechTrends.pdf,
Beverly Hills, CA, 2001/10/11.
81. May, M., Mother Nature's Menders, Scientific
American, http://www.sciam.com/specialissues/0600aging/0600may.html,
2000/06.
82. Miller, H. I., A Need to Reinvent Biotechnology
Regulation at the EPA, Science, 266 5192, 1994/12/16,
1815-1818.
83. Mulligan, R. C., The Basic Science of Gene Therapy,
Science, 260 5110, 1992/05/14, 926-932.
84. Munson, A., Genetically Manipulated Organisms:
International Policy-Making and Implications, International Affairs, 69
3, 1993/07, 497-517.
85. Murray, T. H., Hard Cell, American Prospect,
12 17, http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/17/murray-t.html,
2001/09/24.
86. Nelkin, D., Beyond Risk: reporting about genetics in
the post-Asilomar press, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44 2,
2001, 199-207.
87. Nicolaou, K. C. and Boddy C. N. C., Behind Enemy
Lines, Scientific American, http://www.sciam.com/2001/0501issue/0501nicolaou.html#messenger,
2001/05.
88. Noble, I., Spider scientists spin tough yarn, BBC
News, 2002/01/17.
89. Nussbaum, M. C., Brave Good World, The New Republic, http://www.tnr.com/120400/nussbaum120400.html,
2000/12/04.
90. Obser, J., The gene genie, Salon. com, http://www.salon.com/21st/books/1998/01/cov_15books.html,
1998/05/05.
91. Obser, J., gene blues, Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/21st/feature/1998/04/cov_06feature.html,
1998/06/04.
92. OECD, Conference on New Biotechnology Food and
Crops: Science, Safety and Society, OECD, Paris, http://www1.oecd.org/bangkok/bangkokfinalreport.PDF,
2001.
93. OECD, Biotechnology: A Revolution in the Making,
OECD Information Base, 18 http://interdev.oecd.org/sge/au/Highlights18.htm#top,
1999/09.
94. Oehmke, J. , Biotechnology R&D races, industry
structure, and public and private sector research orientation, AgBioForum, 4 2, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
2002, 105-114.
95. Olson, S., The Genetic Archaeology of Race,
Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2001/04/olson-p1.htm,
69-80.
96. Pearson, I. and Neild I., Technology Timelines,
BTexact Technologies, Adastral Park, Martlesham,
http://www.btexact.com/white_papers/downloads/WP106.pdf, UK, 2002.
97. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology, Harvest
on the Horizon: Future Uses of Agricultural Biotechnology, http://pewagbiotech.org/research/harvest/harvest.pdf,
2001/09.
98. Phillips, M. J., The Future of Agricultural
Biotechnology, 2001/10/01, http://www.bio.org/foodag/weekly/lecture_100101.asp.
99. Phillips, P. and Khachatourians G. G., The Biotechnology Revolution in Global
Agriculture: Invention, Innovation and Investment in the Canola Sector,
CABI, 2001.
100. Pollack, M. A. and Shaffer G. C., Biotechnology:
The Next Transatlantic Trade War?, Washington Quarterly, 23 4, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/washington_quarterly/v023/23.4pollack.html,
2000, 41-54.
101. Pollock, C. J., Farming for the Future:
Biotechnology and Engineering in Perfect Harmony, Journal of Agricultural
Engineering Research, 76 2000, 219-225.
102. Powledge, F., Patenting, Piracy and the Global
Commons, BioScience, 51 4, 2001, 273-277.
103. Powledge, T. M., Gene Therapy R.I.P.,
Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/06/01/gene_therapy/index.html,
2000/06/01.
104. Press, E. and Washburn J., The Kept University,
Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/03/press.htm,
39-54.
105. Radford, T., Biotechnology to kit out soldier of
the Future, The Guardian, 2001/06/22.
106. Reaney, P., Scientists build tiny computer from
DNA, Reuters, 2001/11/22.
107. Reed, J., Trends in Commercial Bioinformatics,
Biotechnology Review , http://www.oscargruss.com/?/healthtech.nsf/vwSpecialReportsWeb,
2000/03/13.
108. Research & Analysis Team, Economic Profile
of the Canadian Biotechnology Sector, Industry Canada, Ottawa, http://www.bhrc.ca/Intelligence/EconProfile.pdf,
2000/03/31.
109. Reuters News Agency, IT vendors bet on biotech,
Reuters News Agency , 2002/01/11.
110. Reuters News Agency, Biotech reaps VC cash,
Reuters News Agency, 2002/01/16.
111. Riordan, T., A Patent for Gene Sequencing, New
York Times, 2002/03/18.
112. Royal Society of Canada, Expert Panel on the
Future of Food Biotechnology, http://www.rsc.ca/foodbiotechnology/indexEN.html,
2001/08/29.
113. Science, Through the Glass Lightly, Science,
267 5204, 1995/03/17, 1609-1618.
114. Senker, J., European Biotechnology Innovation
Systems: Analysis of the Biopharmaceuticals Sector, SPRU University of Sussex,
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/biotechnology/ebis/biopharm.pdf,
2001/06.
115. Senker, J. and van Zwanenberg P., European
Biotechnology Innovation Systems: Final Report, SPRU, University of Sussex, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/biotechnology/ebis/ebisfinalreport.pdf,
2001/10.
116. Senker, J. and van Zwannberg P., European
Biotechnology Innovation System: EC Policy Oveview, SPRU University of Sussex,
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/biotechnology/EC_policy_overview.pdf,
2000/09.
117. Senker, J. et al, Literature review for European
Biotechnology Systems (EBIS), SPRU University of Sussex, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/biotechnology/Litrev1.pdf,
1999/06.
118. Serageldin, I. and Persley G. L., Promethean
Science: Agricultural Biotechnology, the Environment and the Poor,
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, Washington, D.C.,
2000.
119. Shimoda, S., Agricultural biotechnology: Master of
the universe?, AgBioForum, 1 2, 1998,
http://www.agbioforum.org/,
62-68.
120. Shiva, V., Monocultures, Monopolies, Myths and the
Maculinization of Agriculture, Development, 42 2, 1999,
35-38.
121. Somerville, C. R., New Opportunities to Dissect and
Manipulate Plant Process, Philosophical
Transactions: Biological Sciences, 339 1288, 1993/02/23,
199-206.
122. Somerville, C. R., Production of Industrial
Materials in Transgenic Plants, Philosophical Transactions: Biological
Sciences, 342 1301, 1993/11/29, 251-257.
123. SRA International , Focused Study on
Biotechnology & Nanotechnology, Department of Defense, Arlington, VA,
USA, 1997/07/29.
124. Steinberg, D., Biotech Faces Evolving Patent
System, The Scientist, 14 5, 2000/03/06, 8.
125. Stephan, P. E., The Economics of Science,
Journal of Economics Literature, 34 3, 1996/09,
1199-1235.
126. Stix, G., What Clones?, Scientific American,
http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2001/122401clone/index.html,
2001/12/24.
127. Stocum, D. L., Regenerative Biology: A millennial
revolution, Cell and Developmental Biology, 10 1999,
433-450.
128. Swaminathan, M. S., Government - Industry - Civil
Society: Partnerships in Integrated Gene Management, Ambio, 29 2,
115-121.
129. Thacker, E., The Science Fiction of Technoscience:
The Politics of Simulation and a Challenge for the New Media Art,
Leonardo, 34 2, 2001, 155-158.
130. The Economist, Grassroots innovator: Richard
Jefferson, The Economist, 2001/12/06.
131. The Economist, The cutting blob of ethical
politics, The Economist, 2001/07/05.
132. The Economist, The 'sport' of bioengineering,
The Economist, 2002/01/15.
133. The Economist, And now for something completely
different, The Economist, 2002/02/17.
134. Thomas, L. G., Regulation and Firm Size: FDA
Impacts on Innovation, RAND Journal of
Economics, 21 4, 1990/Winter, 497-517.
135. Thompson, C., How It Works: Functional Proteomics,
Globe & Mail, Toronto, 2002/01/25, 32.
136. Thurow, L. C., Building Wealth, Atlantic
Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99jun/9906thurow.htm,
1999/06, 57-69.
137. Tudge, C., The Rise and Fall of Homo sapiens
sapiens, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 325
1228, 1989/11/06, 479-488.
138. van Beuzekom, B., Biotechnology Statistics in OECD
Member Countries: Compendium of Existing National Statistics, OECD, Paris, http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2001doc.nsf/c5ce8ffa41835d64c125685d005300b0/c1256985004c66e3c1256ac600350f21/$FILE/JT00112476.PDF,
2001/06.
139. Wade, N., A Dime View of a 'Posthuman Future', New York Times,
2002/04/02.
140. Weed, W. S., Nobel Dude, Salon.com, http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/03/29/mullis/index.html,
2000/03/29.
141. Weinberg, S., Five and a Half Utopias, Atlantic
Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2000/01/001weinberg.htm,
107-115.
142. Wells, J. G., Establishing a Taxonomical Structure
for the Study of Biotechnology in Secondary School Technology Education,
Journal of Technology Education, 6 1, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/jte-v6n1/wells.jte-v6n1.html,
1994/Fall.
143. Whitehouse, D., Doubts over 'pharming'
technology, BBC News, London.
144. Whitehouse, D., Simple error means big change,
BBC News, London, 2002/02/08.
145. Willis, D., Billionaire suspends stem cell
donation, BBC News, 2001/09/01.
146. Woerner, S. and Reiss T., European Biotechnology
Innovation Systems: Analysis of the Biotech Equipment and Supplies Sector,
Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/biotechnology/Litrev1.pdf,
2001/02.
147. Wolf, S. and Zilberman D., Public science,
biotechnology, and the industrial organization of agrofood systems,
AgriBioForum, 2 1, http://www.agbioforum.org/,
1999, 37-42.
148. Wong, K., Scientists Spin Spidery Silk,
Scientific American, http://www.sciam.com/news/011802/1.html,
2002/01/18.
149. Zucker, L. G. and Darby M. R., Star Scientists and
Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the
Formation of the Biotechnology Industry, Proceedings of the
150. Zucker, L. G. et al., Intellectual Capital and the
Birth of